Kenneth L. Celestine v. United States
Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit
1Per curiam
Kenneth L. Celestine appeals pro se from a final order entered in the District Court 1 for the Western District of Missouri. Celestine v. United States, No. 82-0128-CV-W-0 (W.D.Mo. Feb. 27, 1987). The district court affirmed the decision of the magistrate 2 finding in favor of the United States on his claim for battery and false imprisonment brought pursuant to the Federal Tort Claims Act (FTCA), 28 U.S.C. §§ 1346(b), 2671-2680. For the reasons discussed below, we affirm the order of the district court.
The facts are fully set forth in the district court’s memorandum opinion. In brief, in…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Rustici v. WeidemeyerSupreme Court of Missouri · 1984
- Salvador Caban v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1982
- Warrem v. ParrishSupreme Court of Missouri · 1969
- Michael Mandel v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1986
- Bertman Ames and Gloria Ames v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1979
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by15 opinions
- Brian Iverson v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2020
- Clarence Washington Flora Jean Washington v. Drug Enforcement AdministrationCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1999
- Nadine Pellegrino v. TSACourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2019
- Leola E. Goodman v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1993
- Pellegrino v. U.S. Transp. SEC. Admin.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2018
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.