Legal Opinion

Georgia Co. v. Richfield Oil Co.

District Court, W.D. Washington

Decided November 21, 1930No. 12989Published

1Opinion of the CourtNeterer, District Judge

(after stating the facts as above).

Compensation for services in rendering assistance to a ship at sea or her eargo, or both, from impending sea peril, when successful and voluntary, is a maritime lien upon the ship or eargo, or both and may be impressed in rem (Admiralty Rule 18 [28 USCA § 723]); and, where the owners or underwriters employ such services, proceedings-in personam against the employer may be had. The Sabine, 101 U. S. 384, 25 L. Ed. 982. There is no authority to proceed against the ship in rem and in personam against1 the employers in the same libeL The Sabine, supra.

*902A court of…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. The" Sabine"Supreme Court of the United States · 1880
  2. United States v. Cornell Steamboat Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1906
  3. The AlaskaDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1885
  4. Stone v. The JewellDistrict Court, S.D. Alabama · 1889
  5. Kaser v. Pacific S. S. Co.District Court, W.D. Washington · 1923

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API