Legal Opinion

Alward v. Broadway Gold Mining Co.

Montana Supreme Court

Decided March 30, 1933No. 6,957PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Matthews

The defendant, the Broadway Gold Mining Company, a Montana corporation, has appealed from a judgment against it and in favor of the plaintiff, Ella P. Alward, entered in an action on a promissory note.

The complaint alleges that the note was made, executed and delivered by the defendant corporation, on February 20, 1918, for $1,181.53, with interest at 10 per cent, per annum, to Mary E. Merk; that certain payments were made thereon by the defendant, leaving a balance due, at the time the action was commenced, of $2,045.90, and that the note was assigned to the plaintiff in January, 1925. The…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. Higgins v. LansinghIllinois Supreme Court · 1895
  2. Cahall v. LoflandCourt of Chancery of Delaware · 1921
  3. Farwell v. Pyle-National Electric Headlight Co.Illinois Supreme Court · 1919
  4. Curtin v. Salmon River Hydraulic Gold Mining & Ditch Co.California Supreme Court · 1900
  5. McConnell v. Combination Mining & Milling Co.Montana Supreme Court · 1904

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Robert S. Gaynor and Janet Stone v. James L. Buckley, Julian N. Cheatham, Robert B. Pamplin, John S. Brandis and Georgia-Pacific CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1963
  2. Pickering v. El Jay Equipment Co., Inc.Idaho Court of Appeals · 1985

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API