Legal Opinion

Padezanin v. Padezanin

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided March 29, 1985No. 7PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

SPAETH, President Judge:

This is an appeal from an order distributing marital property and awarding counsel fees and alimony to appellee. We reverse and remand for further proceedings.

The trial court determined that appellant’s vested Railroad Retirement Pension was marital property and valued it at $64,090. The court let appellant keep his pension but it compensated appellee by distributing to her other marital property equal in value to one-half the value of the pension. Appellant argues that his pension may not be distributed as marital property, and that therefore other marital property…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Hisquierdo v. HisquierdoSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
  2. Drummond v. DrummondSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1964

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Pearson v. PearsonWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1997
  2. McGraw v. McGrawWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1991
  3. Wolfson v. Mutual Life Ins. Co. of New YorkDistrict Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · 1978
  4. Belt v. BeltNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1987
  5. Talutto v. TaluttoSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1988

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API