Legal Opinion

Foulke v. Thalmessinger

The Superior Court of New York City

Decided April 15, 1894Published

Appeal by defendant from judgment entered on verdict of jury in favor of plaintiff, and from order denying motion for new trial.

1Opinion of the CourtMcAdam, J.

The plaintiff sued to recover $583.33 as-a balance due on a contract of employment comméncing June 16th, 1890, and continuing until January 1st, 1891, at the agreed compensation of $2,000 per year. The plaintiff testified to the contract as stated and to the performance of the required services under it. 'The defendant, on the other hand, denied the making of the al*850leged contract, and insisted that the arrangement made with the plaintiff was of a temporary character looking forward to the formation of a safe deposit company, in which he expected to obtain permanent employment for the…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Barrett v. . the Third Avenue R.R. Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1871
  2. Watkins v. WallaceMichigan Supreme Court · 1869
  3. New York and Brooklyn Ferry Company v. . MooreNew York Court of Appeals · 1886
  4. New York & Brooklyn Ferry Co. v. MooreNew York Court of Appeals · 1886
  5. Freund v. PatenNew York Court of Common Pleas · 1882

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API