Legal Opinion

Kemp v. Gartenberg

New York Supreme Court

Decided January 15, 1916PublishedCited by 2 opinions

Motion to punish Morris Gartenberg, one of the judgment debtors, for contempt.

1Opinion of the CourtGiegerich, J.

This is a motion to punish for contempt Morris Gartenberg, one of the judgment debtors, for his failure to appear for examination, pursuant to an order in proceedings supplementary to execution. The order was granted upon the affidavit of one Edward H. Burger, wherein he alleges ‘ ‘ that he is the attorney for the plaintiff, who is the judgment creditor in this proceeding.” The right of the plaintiff or the said attorney to institute the proceedings is challenged by the respondent on the ground that it affirmatively appears from the affidavit of Mr. Burger that the ‘ ‘ judgment was duly…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Ross v. ClussmanThe Superior Court of New York City · 1850
  2. Brown v. WalkerNew York Supreme Court · 1889
  3. Maigille v. LeonardAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1905
  4. Frederick v. DeckerNew York Supreme Court · 1859
  5. Crill v. KornmeyerNew York Supreme Court · 1878

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Catrakis v. JarisAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1952
  2. Earl v. BrewerNew York Supreme Court · 1935

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API