Legal Opinion
Claim of Goldstein v. Goldstein
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Decided January 15, 1935PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
— Policy insured the Goldie Dress Company. Claimant worked for the Goldie Dress Company both at the time policy was issued and at the time of the accident. After the issuance of the policy one “ proprietor ” retired from the Goldie Dress Company. The business continued otherwise without change. Award affirmed, with costs to the State Industrial Board against the appellant. Hill, P. J., McNamee, Crapser and Hefíernan, JJ., concur; Rhodes, J., dissents and votes to reverse the award and to dismiss the claim as against the carrier, on the authority of Matter of Ardolino v. lerna (225 App. Div.…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Claim of Ardolino v. IernaAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1929
3Cited by4 opinions
- David Lazarus v. Manufacturers Casualty Insurance Company, a Body CorporateCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1959
- Claim of Fredenburgh v. BenjaminAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1956
- David Lazarus v. Manufacturers Casualty Insurance Company, a Body CorporateCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1959
- Matter of Smith v. ParkAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2018