Legal Opinion

Saskatchewan Minerals v. United States

District Court, W.D. Washington

Decided December 9, 1965No. Civ. No. 6415PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BEEKS, District Judge.

This is a proceeding under 28 U.S.C. § 2321 for review of an order of the Interstate Commerce Commission, Division No. 2, which dismissed the complaint filed herein.

Petitioner, Saskatchewan Minerals, Sodium Sulphate Division, is a Crown corporation organized under the laws of the Province of Saskatchewan, Canada. Its place of business is at Chaplin, Saskatchewan and it engages in the production and sale of natural sodium sulphate, more commonly referred to as salt cake. The subject of this review is an order of the Commission denying petitioner relief under 49 U.S.C. §…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Atchison, Topeka and Santa Fe Railway Co. v. United StatesDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 1963

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Trailways of New England, Inc. v. Civil Aeronautics Board, Transcontinental Bus System, Inc. v. Civil Aeronautics BoardCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1969
  2. A. Lindberg & Sons, Inc. v. United StatesDistrict Court, W.D. Michigan · 1976
  3. Arkansas-Best Freight System, Inc. v. United StatesDistrict Court, W.D. Arkansas · 1973
  4. United States v. Saskatchewan MineralsSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
  5. Trailways of New England, Inc. v. Civil Aeronautics Board, Transcontinental Bus System, Inc. v. Civil Aeronautics BoardCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1969

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API