Legal Opinion

Simensky, Admx. v. Zwyer

Ohio Court of Appeals

Decided February 16, 1931No. 2455PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtWilliams, J.

We find the court erred in the prejudice of plaintiff in error in giving to the jury defendant’s requests numbers 1, 7, 8 and 9. These requests will be quoted in order and commented on:

“Defendant’s request No. 1. Not every accident that occurs gives rise to a cause of action upon which the party injured may recover damages from some one. Thousands of accidents occur every day for which no one is liable in damages, and often no one is to blame, not éven the ones who are injured. The character or extent of an injury has no bearing upon the question of the liability therefor; neither has the…

2Cited by12 opinions

  1. El Paso Electric Co. v. LeeperTexas Commission of Appeals · 1933
  2. Siratt v. Worth Const. Co.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1953
  3. Loudy v. FariesOhio Court of Appeals · 1985
  4. Webb v. HuffmanCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1959
  5. Garrett v. BrockCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1940

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API