Legal Opinion

Wright v. Wright

New Jersey Court of Chancery

Decided November 15, 1905PublishedCited by 2 opinions

On bill for partition, &c.

1Opinion of the Court

Grey, Y. C.

The bill in this case is filed for the partition or sale of certain lands, lying in the coünty of Salem, between certain tenants in common, one of whom was Prank Wright, who, pending this suit and before the sale of any lands herein, departed this life intestate.

In the lifetime of Prank Wright a judgment was entered by Charles C. Allen in the circuit court of the county of Salem, an execution issued thereon and a levy made thereunder upon his undivided interest in the lands affected by this partition suit. On this judgment and levy $778 remain unpaid.

The judgment creditor, Mr.…

2Cited by2 opinions

  1. In Re Eagleson EstateNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1980
  2. Langlotz v. TraversoNew Jersey Court of Chancery · 1928

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API