Legal Opinion
Rafael Tadeo, Jr. Julieta Lambino Tadeo Roxanne Camille Tadeo Jennifer Ann Lambino Tadeo v. Immigration and Naturalization Service
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided April 26, 1996No. 94-70643UnpublishedCited by 1 opinion
1Opinion of the Court
83 F.3d 429
NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel.
Rafael TADEO, Jr.; Julieta Lambino Tadeo; Roxanne Camille
Tadeo; Jennifer Ann Lambino Tadeo, Petitioners,
v.
IMMIGRATION AND NATURALIZATION SERVICE, Respondent.
No. 94-70643.
United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.
Submitted March 12, 1996.*
Decided April 26, 1996.
Before: THOMPSON, KLEINFELD and TASHIMA, Circuit Judges.
1
MEMORAND…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Immigration & Naturalization Service v. Elias-ZacariasSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
- Immigration & Naturalization Service v. StevicSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Farid Faham Gamal Ghaly v. Immigration and Naturalization ServiceCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1995
- Julio Cesar Berroteran-Melendez v. Immigration and Naturalization ServiceCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1992
- Jacobo Ramos-Vasquez v. Immigration & Naturalization ServiceCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1995
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Cruz-Samayoa v. HolderCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2010