Legal Opinion

Pluard v. Gerrity

Appellate Court of Illinois

Decided January 8, 1909No. Gen. No. 14,285PublishedCited by 6 opinions

Assumpsit. Error to the Municipal Court of Chicago; the Hon. Michael J. Girten, Judge, presiding.

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Chytraus

court.

This is an action ex contractu. The theory of an action is to be ascertained from the written statement of his demand solemnly made by a party in court. When a party deliberately takes a position in court then an estoppel arises which prevents him from changing his position after the termination of that suit, whether the result therein is in his favor or against him. The legal effect of Pluard’s statement of his demand in this case is an assertion that John J. Gerrity and Peter J. Gerrity, the defendants, jointly undertook and promised him to furnish steam heat and hot water and that…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Faulk v. KellumsIllinois Supreme Court · 1870
  2. Briggs v. AdamsIllinois Supreme Court · 1863
  3. Diebler v. StateOhio Court of Appeals · 1932
  4. Heidelmeier v. HechtAppellate Court of Illinois · 1908
  5. Cairo & St. Louis Railroad v. EasterlyIllinois Supreme Court · 1878

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Beaudette v. CavedonSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 1929
  2. Davis v. RobinsonAppellate Court of Illinois · 1939
  3. Devine v. Metropolitan West Side Elevated Railway Co.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1911
  4. Decatur Fruit Growers Ass'n v. Kansas City Southern Railway Co.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1910
  5. Hamilton v. Century Manufacturing Co.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1913

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API