Legal Opinion

In re the Estate of Murray

New York Surrogate's Court

Decided April 15, 1903PublishedCited by 2 opinions

Motion to confirm the report of a referee.

1Opinion of the Court

Thomas, S.

While it may be true that the apartment occupied by the testatrix was held on a letting from month to. month, and the executor could have effected a saving by removing the furniture to a storage warehouse before the will was-*505proved or letters testamentary were issued to him (People ex rel. Gould v. Barker, 150 N. Y. 52), I do not think that he can, at the instance and for the benefit of the contestant, be punished for his failure to do so. The delay in the probate was caused by the contestant, who alleged that the will, or its most important provision, was void, and that the…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. People Ex Rel. Gould v. . BarkerNew York Court of Appeals · 1896
  2. In re the Probate of the Will of MurrayNew York Surrogate's Court · 1901

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Chicago Title & Trust Co. v. Corporation of the Fine Arts BuildingAppellate Court of Illinois · 1918
  2. In re the Judicial Settlement of the Account of O'NielNew York Surrogate's Court · 1899

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API