Legal Opinion

Spiegel v. Hays

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided February 24, 1961No. 38632PublishedCited by 17 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Townsend, Presiding Judge.

It is clear that this petition intends to declare upon a written contract and no other, and it is equally clear that the contract intended to be declared upon is attached as an exhibit to the petition in its entirety and denominated “Exhibit A.” Being so attached and before this court, it alone can be looked to to determine all of its terms and conditions, not only as to its subject matter and date of execution, but as to the parties who entered into it and every other element essential to its validity. If the defendants can admit all that is set out therein and…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Wall v. WallSupreme Court of Georgia · 1933
  2. F. & W. Grand Five-Ten-Twenty-Five Cent Stores Inc. v. EisemanSupreme Court of Georgia · 1925
  3. Byrd v. PihaSupreme Court of Georgia · 1927
  4. Hightower v. AnsleySupreme Court of Georgia · 1906
  5. Southern Feed Stores v. SandersSupreme Court of Georgia · 1942

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. Martin v. PierceCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1977
  2. Goodwin Brothers Leasing, Inc. v. The Citizens Bank, Douglasville, Georgia, Defendant-Third Party v. William C. McKinney Defendants-Third PartyCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1979
  3. Sierra Associates, Ltd. v. Continental Illinois National Bank & Trust Co.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1984
  4. Alice v. Robett Manufacturing Co.District Court, N.D. Georgia · 1970
  5. Zappa v. BasdenCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1988

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API