Legal Opinion

State v. Grant

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided May 21, 2003No. 4D02-379PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the CourtKlein, J.

The trial court granted defendant’s motion to suppress, and the state appeals, arguing that the officer, who saw the defendant drop a glass pipe, had reasonable suspicion to believe the pipe was used to smoke crack. We reverse.

The officer testified that he was walking in a narcotics area, at night, near an abandoned building. He observed the defendant behind a wall, with a lighter in one hand and a glass pipe in the other. When the defendant saw the officer, who had turned on his flashlight, he dropped the pipe. After a backup arrived, the officer retrieved the glass pipe, which contained…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. C.A.M. v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2002

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. STATE OF FLORIDA v. T.M., A CHILDDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2018

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API