Legal Opinion

Nelkin v. Provident Loan Society

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided May 15, 1934Published

1Opinion of the Court

Judgment unanimously directed for plaintiff, without costs, upon agreed statement of facts. The facts in paragraph 10 of the submission may not be considered. (Green v. Wachs, 254 N. Y. 437.) The memorandum did not constitute Moskowitz an agent of the plaintiff for the sale of the ring (Green v. Wachs, supra), and, therefore, the Factors’ Act does not apply. (Pers. Prop. Law, § 43.) The ring having been obtained by Moskowitz from the plaintiff through a common-law larceny “ by trick and device ” for this added reason the Factors’ Act does not apply. (Stone, Inc., v. Provident Loan Society of…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Green v. WachsNew York Court of Appeals · 1930
  2. Walter J. Stone, Inc. v. Provident Loan SocietyNew York Court of Appeals · 1932

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API