Legal Opinion
Sedelnik v. City of Bridgeport
District Court, D. Connecticut
Decided August 8, 2011No. 3:09-cv-1308 (CFD)PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
RULING ON MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT
CHRISTOPHER F. DRONEY, District Judge.
The plaintiff, Jerilyn Sedelnik, brought this action alleging age discrimination in violation of the Age Discrimination in Employment Act (“ADEA”), 29 U.S.C. § 621 et seq. The defendant, the City of Bridgeport, has filed a motion for summary judgment. For the reasons that follow, the defendant’s motion is denied.
I Factual Background1
Beginning in 1996, Jerilyn Sedelnik was employed by the City of Bridgeport’s Information Technology Services (“ITS”) department as a PC Analyst and then as a Network Communication…
2Cases cited20 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. GreenSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Reeves v. Sanderson Plumbing Products, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 2000
- Gross v. FBL Financial Services, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 2009
- Carol A. Gallo v. Prudential Residential Services, Limited Partnership, Doing Business as Prudential Relocation ManagementCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1994
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Ehrbar v. Forest Hills HospitalDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 2015
- Equal Employment Opportunity Commission v. Grane Healthcare Co.District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 2014
- Baluma, S.A. v. PoffDistrict Court, D. Nevada · 2022
- Elliot v. Avangrid Management CompanyDistrict Court, D. Connecticut · 2025
- Kleftogiannis v. Inline Plastics Corp.District Court, D. Connecticut · 2020