Legal Opinion · Dissent

Idaho v. Coeur D'Alene Tribe of Idaho

Supreme Court of the United States

Decided June 23, 1997No. 94-1474Published

1Dissent

Justice Souter,

with whom Justice Stevens, Justice Ginsburg, and Justice Breyer join, dissenting.

Congress has implemented the Constitution’s grant of federal-question jurisdiction by authorizing federal courts to enforce rights arising under the Constitution and federal law. The federal courts have an obligation to exercise that jurisdiction, and in doing so have applied the doctrine of Ex parte Young, 209 U. S. 123 (1908), that in the absence of some congressional limitation a federal court may entertain an individual’s suit to enjoin a state officer from official action that violates federal…

2Cases cited90 opinions

  1. Will v. Michigan Department of State PoliceSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
  2. Scheuer v. RhodesSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
  3. Papasan v. AllainSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  4. Ex Parte YoungSupreme Court of the United States · 1908
  5. Pennhurst State School and Hospital v. HaldermanSupreme Court of the United States · 1984

85 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API