Legal Opinion

Metsker v. Neally

Supreme Court of Kansas

Decided January 15, 1889PublishedCited by 16 opinions

Error from Shawnee District Court. The opinion states the case.

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Holt, C.:

This is an action in mandamus. The alternative writ sets forth substantially that George T. Neally was the city engineer of the city of Topeka, a city of the first class; that on the 3d day of July, 1888, D. C. Metsker, as mayor, attempted to suspend him from his office, and place therein William Tweeddale; and that John F. Carter, as city marshal, acting in concert with the mayor, forcibly and unlawfully deprived plaintiff of his office-room, books, papers, records, etc., and prevented him from exercising the duties of his office. The defendant moved to quash the writ,…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. State ex rel. Gill v. Common Council of WatertownWisconsin Supreme Court · 1859
  2. People ex rel. Brewster v. KilduffIllinois Supreme Court · 1854
  3. Milliken v. City CouncilTexas Supreme Court · 1881
  4. Ex parte WileySupreme Court of Alabama · 1875
  5. State ex rel. Atherton v. SherwoodSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1870

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. Maben v. RosserSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1909
  2. State ex rel. Guion v. MilesSupreme Court of Missouri · 1908
  3. Pratt v. Board of Police & Fire CommissionersUtah Supreme Court · 1897
  4. United States v. MalminCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1921
  5. State ex rel. Jackson v. PratherSupreme Court of Kansas · 1911

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API