Metsker v. Neally
Supreme Court of Kansas
Error from Shawnee District Court. The opinion states the case.
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by
Holt, C.:
This is an action in mandamus. The alternative writ sets forth substantially that George T. Neally was the city engineer of the city of Topeka, a city of the first class; that on the 3d day of July, 1888, D. C. Metsker, as mayor, attempted to suspend him from his office, and place therein William Tweeddale; and that John F. Carter, as city marshal, acting in concert with the mayor, forcibly and unlawfully deprived plaintiff of his office-room, books, papers, records, etc., and prevented him from exercising the duties of his office. The defendant moved to quash the writ,…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- State ex rel. Gill v. Common Council of WatertownWisconsin Supreme Court · 1859
- People ex rel. Brewster v. KilduffIllinois Supreme Court · 1854
- Milliken v. City CouncilTexas Supreme Court · 1881
- Ex parte WileySupreme Court of Alabama · 1875
- State ex rel. Atherton v. SherwoodSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1870
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by16 opinions
- Maben v. RosserSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1909
- State ex rel. Guion v. MilesSupreme Court of Missouri · 1908
- Pratt v. Board of Police & Fire CommissionersUtah Supreme Court · 1897
- United States v. MalminCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1921
- State ex rel. Jackson v. PratherSupreme Court of Kansas · 1911
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.