Legal Opinion

Singer v. Ritter

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided July 20, 1950No. Appeal, 26PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Dithrich, J.,

Early in October 1939, defendant appellant and Charles Singer, who was at the time plaintiff appellee’s husband, were desirous of forming a partnership for the purpose of operating a dental laboratory. Each was to contribute $1500 to the partnership, and, since neither had sufficient capital, appellee agreed to obtain a mortgage on premises owned by her and to turn the proceeds oyer to her husband and appellant to enable them to set up their laboratory. She obtained a mortgage for $2000, and it was agreed that the partnership would assume the obligation of the mortgage…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Mielcuszny Et Ux. v. Rosol (Et Ux.)Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1934
  2. Bank v. FulmorSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1889
  3. Charles D. Kaier Co. v. O'brienSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1902
  4. Augustine v. WolfSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1906
  5. Mutual Building & Loan Ass'n v. WalukiewiczSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1936

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Key Savings & Loan Ass'n v. Louis John, Inc.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1988
  2. Mamalis v. Atlas Van Lines, Inc.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1987
  3. L. & N. SALES CO. v. StuskiSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1958
  4. Trizechahn Gateway LLC v. TitusSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2007
  5. Budget Charge Accounts, Inc. v. MullaneySuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1958

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API