Legal Opinion

Cooley v. Harris

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided June 10, 1892PublishedCited by 2 opinions

Appeal from Branch. (Loveridge, J.) Bill to foreclose a mortgage. Complainant appeals. The facts are stated in the opinion.

1Opinion of the CourtMcGrath, J.

This is a bill filed to foi’eelose a mortgage dated June 11, 1886, given by defendants upon parcels A, B, O, D, and E, shown in the diagram on next page.

The bill alleges that parcels A and E were by mistake

*131

•described in the mortgage as the E. ‡ of tbe N. W. i, and that the parcel B was described as in the S. W. i instead of the S. E. that at the time of the execution of the mortgage defendants owned no part of the E. ■of the N W. ¿, or of the S. W. but did own the E. $ of the N. E. ^ and parcel B of the S. E. £, and that the land intended to be described was the E. \ of the N. E. ¿ and said…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Dutton v. IvesMichigan Supreme Court · 1858

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Lau v. StackMichigan Supreme Court · 1934
  2. Griffin v. Union Guardian Trust Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1932

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API