Legal Opinion

Burwell Irrigation Co. v. Lashmett

Nebraska Supreme Court

Decided January 24, 1900No. 9,094PublishedCited by 5 opinions

Error from the district court of Garfield county. Tried below before Kendall, J.

1Opinion of the CourtHolcomb, J.

Tbis action was begun in tbe lower court for a recovery, quantum meruit, for labor alleged to bave been performed by defendant in error for plaintiff in error in tbe construction of an irrigation ditcb. A jury was waived, and trial bad to tbe court, wbicb resulted in favor of tbe plaintiff below. Defendant brings tbe case bere for review.

While several errors are assigned as ground for reversal, but two are argued in brief of counsel, and they only will be considered in determining tbe cause. It is urged that tbe petition does not state facts sufficient to constitute a cause of action, and…

2Cited by5 opinions

  1. H. J. Hughes Co. v. Farmers Union Produce Co.Nebraska Supreme Court · 1923
  2. Old Omaha Ass'n v. City of OmahaNebraska Court of Appeals · 1994
  3. Curley v. WhiteNebraska Supreme Court · 1935
  4. Retail Merchants Service v. John Bauer & Co.Nebraska Supreme Court · 1933
  5. Rieger v. SchaibleNebraska Supreme Court · 1909

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API