Legal Opinion

Beaty v. State

Indiana Court of Appeals

Decided November 21, 2006No. 71A03-0511-CR-556PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

SULLIVAN, Judge.

Following a jury trial, Appellant, Charles Beaty, was convicted of two counts of Theft as a Class D felony and two counts of Receiving Stolen Property as a Class D felony.1 Upon appeal, Beaty presents two issues for our review, which we restate as: (1) whether the trial court erred in limiting Beaty's cross-examination of one of the State's witnesses, and (2) whether the single larceny rule precludes Beaty's convictions upon both counts of Receiving Stolen Property.

We affirm.

The facts most favorable to the jury's verdicts reveal that in 2002, John Hohler was a lumber…

Also in this document: Concurrence.

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Davis v. AlaskaSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
  2. Johnson v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals · 2005
  3. Hamilton v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 1937
  4. State v. GilbertOregon Supreme Court · 1978
  5. People v. HarrisCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1977

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Frank Jacobs v. State of IndianaIndiana Supreme Court · 2015
  2. State of West Virginia v. Gina Marie JerromeWest Virginia Supreme Court · 2014
  3. Webb v. StateCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 2009
  4. Compton v. EckmanOhio Court of Appeals · 2012
  5. Beaty v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals · 2006

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API