Legal Opinion

Hopkins Manufacturing Co. v. Aurora Fire & Marine Insurance

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided April 12, 1882PublishedCited by 11 opinions

'Error to Manistee. Assumpsit. Defendant brings error.

1Opinion of the CourtCampbell, J.

Plaintiffs recovered judgment below on a policy of insurance issued in the name of William Stevens but payable to plaintiffs as their interest should appear. The chief defence was based on an objection to the right of plaintiffs to sue in their own name. Some questions of evidence were raised, all but one of which relate to this point. Exceptions were also regularly taken to the refusal of the court to give certain charges. The exception to the charge .actually given instead of pointing out the rulings complained of was one general exception to the whole charge. As the -charge covered several…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Hartford Fire Ins. v. DavenportMichigan Supreme Court · 1877
  2. Pipp v. ReynoldsMichigan Supreme Court · 1870

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Shelp v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1897
  2. Rankin v. City of Big RapidsCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1904
  3. Granger v. Manchester Fire Assurance Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1899
  4. Perkins v. Century Insurance v. British General InsuranceMichigan Supreme Court · 1942
  5. Richelieu & Ontario Navigation Co. v. Thames & Mersey Marine InsuranceMichigan Supreme Court · 1885

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API