Wimberley v. Atlantic Coast Line Railroad
Supreme Court of North Carolina
1Opinion of the CourtStacy, C. J.
It is alleged in the complaint and admitted by the answer that the defendant is a common carrier by railroad, engaged in interstate commerce, and that plaintiff’s intestate was employed by the defendant in such commerce at the time of his injury and death. The case, therefore, is one arising under the Federal Employers’ Liability Act, and it has properly been tried under that act. Shanks v. Del. R. Co., 239 U. S., 556; Capps v. R. R., 183 N. C., 181. The deceased employee left a widow and one small son him surviving, and his administrator, or personal representative, is prosecuting this suit…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Sweeney v. ErvingSupreme Court of the United States · 1913
- Shanks v. Delaware, Lackawanna & Western RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1916
- New Orleans & Northeastern Railroad v. HarrisSupreme Court of the United States · 1918
- Looney v. Metropolitan RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1906
- Reed v. Director General of RailroadsSupreme Court of the United States · 1922
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Jackson Ex Rel. Porter v. ScheiberSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1936
- Southwell v. Atlantic Coast Line RailroadSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1926
- Shiver v. Atlantic Coast Line R. Co.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1930