Legal Opinion

Shillcutt v. State

Wisconsin Supreme Court

Decided December 14, 1976No. 75-617-CRPublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Per curiam

The issues on appeal are as follows:

1. Is the evidence sufficient to support a conviction for pandering under sec. 944.33(1) (a) or (2), Stats.?

2. Is soliciting a prostitute under sec. 944.32, Stats., an included offense in keeping a house of prostitution under sec. 944.34?

3. Is sec. 944.32, Stats., an unconstitutional restriction of free speech as applied to the facts of this case?

4. Is the evidence sufficient to support conviction for a violation of sec. 944.34 (2), Stats. ?

The first issue deals with sufficiency of the evidence to convict for pandering. Sec. 944.33 (1) (a), Stats.,…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. State v. LambertWisconsin Supreme Court · 1975
  2. Malzac v. SalmioSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1939
  3. State v. LarsonWisconsin Supreme Court · 1931

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. International Foundation of Employee Benefit Plans, Inc. v. City of BrookfieldCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 1980
  2. State v. JohnsonCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 1982
  3. Shillcutt v. StateWisconsin Supreme Court · 1976
  4. Shillcutt v. StateWisconsin Supreme Court · 1976

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API