Legal Opinion

Johnson v. State

Supreme Court of Arkansas

Decided September 24, 1928PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtKikby, J.

Appellant -prosecutes this -appeal from a judgment of conviction for selling intoxicating liquors, and has abandoned all assignments of error save one— that the court erred in permitting the introduction of incompetent testimony.

Indictment was returned on the 29th day of November, 1927, and charged the -sale to have been made on the 26th day of July, 1927.

Two witnesses testified that ’they purchased a pint of whiskey from appellant on the 26th day of July, and the sheriff was -allowed to testify, over objections, that he had made a search of the defendant’s premises since he was arrested for…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Casteel v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1921
  2. Tong v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1925
  3. Lynn v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1925
  4. Taylor v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1925

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Clark v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1969
  2. Maloney v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1930

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API