Legal Opinion

Nolan v. Feltman

Court of Appeals of Kentucky

Decided April 15, 1876PublishedCited by 3 opinions

Case 22 —PETITION ORDINARY APPEAL PROM KENTON COMMON PLEAS COURT. CITED 5 Ind. 395, Reasoner v. Edmondson. 3 Littell, 124, Cummings v. Kennedy. 7 J. J. Mar. 439, Triplett v. Gill. 1 Dana, 306, Simpson v. Hawkins.

Read the full summary

Case 22 —PETITION ORDINARY APPEAL PROM KENTON COMMON PLEAS COURT. CITED 5 Ind. 395, Reasoner v. Edmondson. 3 Littell, 124, Cummings v. Kennedy. 7 J. J. Mar. 439, Triplett v. Gill. 1 Dana, 306, Simpson v. Hawkins. Civil Code, section 10. 2J. J. Mar. 438, Fitzhugh v. Croghan. 6 Dana, 446, Bowling’s rep’s v. Dobyn’s adm’r. 4 Mon. 297, Morgan’s heirs v. Boone’s heirs. 1 Duvall, 196, Longest’s adm’r v. Tyler. 2 Bibb, 569, Cosby v. West. 17 B. Mon. 85, Hunt v. Owings. 15 B. Mon. 73, Smith v. Moberly. 31 Miss. 544, Burrus v. Wilkinson. 12 Peters, 295, Galloway v. Finlay. 11 N. H. 74, 87, Loomis v.…

1Opinion of the Court

JUDGE GOFER

delivered the opinion of the court.

On June 20, 1867, the appellants sold and conveyed to the appellee certain real estate in the city of Covington at the price of $9,000 then paid.

The appellee was subsequently sued by the devisees of Samuel Butts, who recovered a judgment against him for the property; but he was adjudged entitled to be paid for improvements put upon it by the appellants and their vendors, subject, however, to a deduction for the rent after he came into possession.

The rents were ascertained to amount to the sum of *121$2,408.42, and the improvements were estimated at…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Burrus v. WilkinsonMississippi Supreme Court · 1856

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Hardy v. RussellCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1918
  2. Lewis' Admr. v. Bowling Green Railway Co.Court of Appeals of Kentucky · 1912
  3. Casebolt v. HallCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1917

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API