Legal Opinion · Dissent

Demar v. Department of Labor

Supreme Court of Vermont

Decided July 1, 2010No. 09-271Published

1Dissent

Johnson, J.,

¶ 8. dissenting. The majority’s decision today requires an em*580ployee with good cause to leave her employment to jump through an unreasonable and futile hoop to maintain eligibility for unemployment compensation benefits. In doing so, the majority undercuts the legislative purpose behind our unemployment compensation and wage and hour laws — laws that are meant to protect workers from exploitative and unfair working conditions. Because I cannot agree that an employee’s reasonable refusal to attend what can only be described as a futile meeting bars an otherwise valid claim to…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Colduvell v. CommonwealthCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1979
  2. Skudlarek v. Department of Employment & TrainingSupreme Court of Vermont · 1993
  3. Allen v. Department of Employment SecuritySupreme Court of Vermont · 1982
  4. Rushlow v. Department of Employment & TrainingSupreme Court of Vermont · 1984
  5. Seymour v. Department of Employment SecuritySupreme Court of Vermont · 1979

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API