Legal Opinion

Altieri v. United States

United States Customs Court

Decided February 6, 1963No. 67410; protest 61/17744 (San Juan)PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

Lawrence, Judge:

An importation described on the export invoice as “Hot Bolled Annealed De-Oxidised Non-Arsenical Copper Circles With Band Sawn Edges” was classified by the collector of customs in paragraph 397 of the Tariff Act of 1930 (19 U.S.C. § 1001, par. 397), as modified by the General Agreement on Tariffs and Trade, 82 Treas. Dec. 305, T.D. 51802, which provides for articles not specially provided for, partly or wholly manufactured, composed *198wholly or in chief value of copper, and duty was assessed thereon at the rate of 22% per centum ad valorem. An additional tax on the copper…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. United States v. PottsSupreme Court of the United States · 1809
  2. United States v. Kid and WatsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1807
  3. Sciaky Bros., Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1958

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Altieri v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1967

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API