Legal Opinion

Barney v. Van Auken

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided July 12, 2012Published

1Opinion of the CourtLahtinen, J.

The parties’ daughter (born in 1990) moved from respondent’s *960residence to petitioner’s home when she turned 18 in November 2008, and in May 2009 petitioner commenced this proceeding seeking child support. Respondent’s defenses included visitation as a defense, alleged as abandonment. Since the Support Magistrate improperly ruled upon such issue without referring it to Family Court, we reversed and remitted (81 AD3d 1129 [2011]). Upon remittal, and after a hearing in May 2011 at which the parties appeared pro se, Family Court found that respondent failed to sustain his burden of proving the…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Martin v. MillsAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2012
  2. Kelley v. VanDeeAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2009
  3. Halse v. HalseAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2012
  4. Boccalino v. BoccalinoAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2009
  5. Barney v. Van AukenAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2011

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API