Legal Opinion

Nunez v. Alford

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided January 20, 1960No. 1482PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Per curiam

The chancellor denied motions of the appellants to dismiss, for more definite statement, to strike, and to require the filing of additional portions of the record, all directed to a second amended complaint in the nature of a bill of review. Because of this ruling this interlocutory appeal has resulted.

At this juncture we observe that this case has been before this court on one previous occasion. Alford v. Nunez, Fla.App.1958, 104 So.2d 677. It was an interlocutory appeal from an order granting a motion to dismiss the complaint, which order was affirmed by this court with leave to amend.…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Hough v. MensesSupreme Court of Florida · 1957
  2. Stone v. StoneDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1957
  3. Grable v. NunezSupreme Court of Florida · 1953
  4. ARMENIAN HOTEL OWNERS v. KulhanjianSupreme Court of Florida · 1957
  5. Braz v. Professional Insurance CorporationDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1958

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Orlovsky v. Solid Surf, Inc.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 1981
  2. Kutner v. KalishDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1965
  3. Frank v. LevineDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1964
  4. PROVIDENT FUNDING ASSOCIATES, L. P. v. M D T R, AS TRUSTEEDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2018
  5. Thompson v. Safeco Insurance Company of AmericaDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1967

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API