Legal Opinion

Oreck v. Oreck

Louisiana Court of Appeal

Decided September 24, 1987No. CA 7547PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HERBERT A. CADE, Judge Pro Tern.

Appellant, Carole H. Burstein, was retained in November of 1983 to represent Sandra Zahn Oreck in a divorce proceeding. By verbal agreement the parties set a *1238$75.00 hourly fee. Appellant accepted certain art works, valued by the trial judge at $4100.00, as partial payment, and had received no other payment for services rendered when on May 20, 1985 she was discharged by Mrs. Oreck.

Appellant forwarded a statement for $11,890.75. Subsequently she intervened in the divorce proceeding, amended her statement to $16,890.75 and caused notice of lis pendens to be…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Villaume v. VillaumeSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1978
  2. Pennison v. PennisonLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1964
  3. Tuttle v. TuttleSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1985
  4. Tuttle v. TuttleLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1983
  5. Tooley v. PennisonSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1964

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Lobell v. DennLouisiana Court of Appeal · 2018
  2. Lobell v. DennLouisiana Court of Appeal · 2018

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API