STATE OF MISSOURI, Plaintiff-Respondent v. TIMOTHY F. PLOPPER
Missouri Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the CourtGary W. Lynch, J.
A jury found Timothy F. Plopper (“Defendant”) guilty of tampering with a witness, see section 575.270, and tampering in the first' degree, see section 569.080. 1 On appeal, Defendant claims that there is insufficient evidénce to support his convictions. Finding no merit in Defendant’s claims, we affirm;
Standard of Review
' In reviewing a claim that there was not sufficient-evidence to sustain a criminal conviction, this Court does not weigh the evidence but, rather, accepts as true all evidence tending to prove guilt together with all reasonable inferences that support the verdict, and ignores…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- State v. GrimSupreme Court of Missouri · 1993
- State v. WhalenSupreme Court of Missouri · 2001
- State v. CastaldiSupreme Court of Missouri · 1965
- State v. FreemanSupreme Court of Missouri · 2008
- State v. LinkSupreme Court of Missouri · 2000
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- State v. HooperMissouri Court of Appeals · 2018
- STATE OF MISSOURI, Plaintiff-Respondent v. SHEENA DARLENE CORDELLMissouri Court of Appeals · 2016
- STATE OF MISSOURI v. DOYLE EDWARD HITCHCOCKMissouri Court of Appeals · 2019
- STATE OF MISSOURI, Plaintiff-Respondent v. JOHN MARTIN HAMILTON, JR.Missouri Court of Appeals · 2023
- STATE OF MISSOURI, Plaintiff-Respondent v. ROBERT C. ROSTMissouri Court of Appeals · 2024
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.