Legal Opinion

Franklin v. Stoddart

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided November 7, 1885PublishedCited by 2 opinions

Appeal by defendant from an order of the district court for Henne-pin county, refusing a new trial after a trial before Young, J., and verdict for defendant under direction of the court for the value of the property as found by the jury.

1Opinion of the CourtGilfillan, C. J.

Action for the conversion of a mare, wagon, set of harness, lap-robe, whip, and halter. One Allardt originally owned the property, and on November 4, 1884, he and plaintiff made a bet on the then pending presidential election; Allardt betting the property that James G. Blaine would be elected president, against $350 staked by plaintiff that Grover Cleveland would be elected. One G. F. Farrington was agreed on as stakeholder, and, to perfect the bet, Allardt then made to Farrington a bill of sale of the property, and plaintiff executed his note to Farrington for $350, payable on demand, and…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Tarleton v. BakerSupreme Court of Vermont · 1843
  2. Miller v. Le PiebreMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1883

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. F. M. Davies & Co. v. PorterCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1918
  2. Bosshard v. County of SteeleSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1927

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API