Legal Opinion

Union of Concerned Scientists v. DOE

Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit

Decided May 28, 2021No. 20-1247PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

United States Court of Appeals FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CIRCUIT Argued March 12, 2021 Decided May 28, 2021 No. 20-1247 UNION OF CONCERNED SCIENTISTS, PETITIONER v. UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY, RESPONDENT On Petition for Review of an Order of the Department of Energy David C. Bender argued the cause for petitioner. On the briefs were Kim Smaczniak and Charles Carter Hall. Sarah Carroll, Attorney, U.S. Department of Justice, argued the cause for respondent. With her on the brief were Brian M. Boynton, Acting Assistant Attorney General, and Michael S. Raab, Attorney. Delia D.…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Lujan v. Defenders of WildlifeSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
  2. Steel Co. v. Citizens for a Better EnvironmentSupreme Court of the United States · 1998
  3. Clapper v. Amnesty International USASupreme Court of the United States · 2013
  4. Joseph Arpaio v. Barack ObamaCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2015
  5. Wyoming Outdoor Council v. United States Forest ServiceCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1999

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Mohammed Jibril v. Alejandro MayorkasCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2021
  2. Coalition of MISO Transmission v. FERCCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2022
  3. Kentucky Municipal Energy Agency v. FERCCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2022
  4. LSP Transmission Holdings II, LLC v. FERCCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2022
  5. Americans for Fair Treatment v. United States Postal ServiceDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2023

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API