Bonsack Machine Co. v. Woodrum
Supreme Court of Virginia
Appeal from decree of circuit court of city of Roanoke, rendered, in vacation, April lOtli, 1890, in a suit wherein the appellant, the Bonsack Machine Company, was complainant, and R. H. Woodrum was defendant.
1Opinion of the CourtFauntlbroy, J.
The hill is for specific performance of the covenant contained in the clause of an agreement under seal, entered on the 10th day of July, 1888, between the Bonsack Machine Company, *513of Salem, Virginia, of the first part, and E. H. Woodrum, of Roanoke, Virginia, of the second part, as follows : “ And it is expressly agreed by the said Woodrum, that he shall, in no event, either directly or indirectly, have anything to do with any other cigarette machine than those of the said company, unless by the full consent in writiug of the said company, and under such contract and arrangements as the said…
2Cited by7 opinions
- C. & O. Railroad v. LeeSupreme Court of Virginia · 1888
- Lee v. TapscottCourt of Appeals of Virginia · 1796
- Lee v. TapscottCourt of Appeals of Virginia · 1796
- Lee v. TapscottCourt of Appeals of Virginia · 1796
- Perry v. M. O'Neil & Co.Ohio Supreme Court · 1908
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.