Legal Opinion

Weiland Tool & Manufacturing Co. v. Whitney

Appellate Court of Illinois

Decided March 11, 1963No. Gen. 48,020PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice English

Plaintiff’s complaint in equity sought damages for breach of contract and for the declaration and satisfaction of a lien on machinery and other property belonging to defendant. Defendant and Hexarmour Company filed a counterclaim for damages arising from the same contract, and for conversion of their property. A decree was entered in favor of plaintiff on both complaint and counterclaim, and defendant has appealed.

As we see this case, almost all the differences between the parties stem from their opposing views as to what constituted the basic contract. The master and the chancellor found in…

Also in this document: Concurrence.

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. Hinckley v. Pittsburgh Bessemer Steel Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1887
  2. Green v. Ashland Sixty-Third State BankIllinois Supreme Court · 1931
  3. Fuchs & Lang Manufacturing Co. v. R. J. Kittredge & Co.Illinois Supreme Court · 1909
  4. Consoer, Townsend & Associates v. AddisAppellate Court of Illinois · 1962
  5. Bundesen v. LewisIllinois Supreme Court · 1938

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Weiland Tool & Manufacturing Co. v. WhitneyIllinois Supreme Court · 1969
  2. Weiland Tool & Manufacturing Co. v. WhitneyAppellate Court of Illinois · 1968
  3. St. Paul Federal Bank v. WesbyAppellate Court of Illinois · 1986
  4. Nardi, Pain & Podolsky, Inc. v. Vignola Furniture Co.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1967
  5. McNeill Asphalt Co. v. StateCourt of Claims of Illinois · 1984

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API