General Motors Corp. v. Let's Make a Deal
District Court, D. Nevada
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER
HAGEN, District Judge.
Before the court is plaintiffs motion for preliminary injunction (#3), defendants’ opposition (#’s 17/18), and plaintiffs reply (# 19). Also before the court is its order (#22) requiring plaintiff to show cause why defendants were properly notified of the preliminary injunction proceedings. For the reasons set out below, the court finds that defendants were properly notified of the proceedings and that plaintiff is entitled to injunctive relief.
I. Factual Background
Plaintiff, a Delaware corporation, is an automobile manufacturer, and it and its predecessors have…
2Cases cited26 opinions
- Granny Goose Foods, Inc. v. Brotherhood of Teamsters & Auto Truck Drivers, Local No. 70Supreme Court of the United States · 1974
- Two Pesos, Inc. v. Taco Cabana, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1992
- Amf Incorporated, a Corporation v. Sleekcraft Boats, a Sole Proprietorship, and Bruce E. Nescher, an IndividualCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1979
- Brookfield Communications, Inc. v. West Coast Entertainment CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1999
- Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. v. Samara Brothers, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 2000
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- General Motors Corp. v. Urban Gorilla, LLCCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2007
- Caesars World, Inc. v. MilanianDistrict Court, D. Nevada · 2003
- General Motors Corp. v. Phat Cat Carts, Inc.District Court, M.D. Florida · 2007
- Global Manufacture Group, LLC v. Gadget Universe.ComDistrict Court, S.D. California · 2006
- SMC Promotions, Inc. v. SMC PromotionsDistrict Court, C.D. California · 2005
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.