Legal Opinion

Norton v. State

Idaho Supreme Court

Decided June 15, 1970No. 10423PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

SHEPARD, Justice.

In this case a writ of habeas corpus was sought and issued by the district court preventing the interstate extradition of the accused, R. L. Norton. After certain preliminary proceedings which are not questioned herein a hearing was held upon said writ and thereafter the writ was quashed. Petitioner appeals from that order and we affirm.

Norton was charged by an information with the crime of embezzlement in Oklahoma. A fugitive warrant was issued and when Norton was found residing in Rigby, Idaho, a warrant for his arrest was issued in Idaho. While confined to the Bannock…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Roberts v. ReillySupreme Court of the United States · 1885
  2. Hyatt v. People Ex Rel. CorkranSupreme Court of the United States · 1903
  3. Drew v. ThawSupreme Court of the United States · 1914
  4. South Carolina v. BaileySupreme Court of the United States · 1933
  5. Pettibone v. NicholsSupreme Court of the United States · 1906

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Jacobsen v. StateIdaho Supreme Court · 1978
  2. Walton v. StateIdaho Supreme Court · 1977
  3. Snyder v. StateIdaho Supreme Court · 1973
  4. Balla v. StateIdaho Supreme Court · 1977
  5. Clark v. WardenCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 1978

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API