Legal Opinion

Beall v. Clack

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided November 25, 1916No. 8479PublishedCited by 2 opinions

Appeal from Taylor County Court; E. M. Overshiner, Judge. Suit by E. E. Clack against J. H. Beall and others. From a judgment of the county court for plaintiff on appeal from the justice court, defendants Beall, Smith, and Spencer bring error.

1Opinion of the CourtBuck, J.

On June 1, 1913, J. C. Ham, president of, and acting for, the Ham Lumber Company, a corporation-located at Mer-kel, Tex., employed E. E. Clack, an attorney residing at Sweetwater, to collect or adjust a judgment in favor of the lumber company against one R.. P. Arnold, and agreed to give Clack a one-half interest in said judgment for his services in collecting it. By said agreement Clack was invested with full power to collect or adjust said judgment upon such terms as he might deem proper, and to release the same, and his services were to continue until the collection had been effect-, ed.…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Spraights v. . HawleyNew York Court of Appeals · 1868
  2. Baker v. WassonTexas Supreme Court · 1880
  3. Eastin & Knox v. Texas & Pacific Railway Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1906
  4. Collier v. Wm. Cameron & Co.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1909
  5. Sloan v. GilmoreCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1914

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Peck v. PowellCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1924
  2. Peck v. PowellCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1924

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API