Sherman Park State Bank v. Loop Office Building Corp.
Appellate Court of Illinois
1Opinion of the CourtJustice McSurely
This is an appeal from an interlocutory order appointing a receiver solely on the allegations of a bill.
Eeceivers should not be appointed except on proof of grounds showing fraud or immediate danger to the property unless it is taken into the custody of the. court. Nartsik v. Ehman, 191 Ill. App. 71.
If the motion for the appointment of a receiver is based upon the allegations of a bill, it must be sworn to, otherwise there is no competent evidence furnishing a basis for the appointment of a receiver. Daley v. Nelson, 119 Ill. App. 627. An examination of the affidavit attached to the instant…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Siegmund v. AscherAppellate Court of Illinois · 1890
- Watson v. CudneyAppellate Court of Illinois · 1908
- Nartzik v. EhmanAppellate Court of Illinois · 1914
- Daley v. NelsonAppellate Court of Illinois · 1905
- Gibberman v. StangalAppellate Court of Illinois · 1917
3Cited by11 opinions
- Simpson v. AdkinsAppellate Court of Illinois · 1941
- Central Trust Co. v. McGurnAppellate Court of Illinois · 1930
- Grabowski v. MacLaskeyAppellate Court of Illinois · 1930
- Chicago Title & Trust Co v. BickleyAppellate Court of Illinois · 1929
- State ex rel. Fatzer v. MolitorSupreme Court of Kansas · 1953
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.