Legal Opinion

Sherman Park State Bank v. Loop Office Building Corp.

Appellate Court of Illinois

Decided November 30, 1925No. Gen. No. 30,799PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice McSurely

This is an appeal from an interlocutory order appointing a receiver solely on the allegations of a bill.

Eeceivers should not be appointed except on proof of grounds showing fraud or immediate danger to the property unless it is taken into the custody of the. court. Nartsik v. Ehman, 191 Ill. App. 71.

If the motion for the appointment of a receiver is based upon the allegations of a bill, it must be sworn to, otherwise there is no competent evidence furnishing a basis for the appointment of a receiver. Daley v. Nelson, 119 Ill. App. 627. An examination of the affidavit attached to the instant…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Siegmund v. AscherAppellate Court of Illinois · 1890
  2. Watson v. CudneyAppellate Court of Illinois · 1908
  3. Nartzik v. EhmanAppellate Court of Illinois · 1914
  4. Daley v. NelsonAppellate Court of Illinois · 1905
  5. Gibberman v. StangalAppellate Court of Illinois · 1917

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Simpson v. AdkinsAppellate Court of Illinois · 1941
  2. Central Trust Co. v. McGurnAppellate Court of Illinois · 1930
  3. Grabowski v. MacLaskeyAppellate Court of Illinois · 1930
  4. Chicago Title & Trust Co v. BickleyAppellate Court of Illinois · 1929
  5. State ex rel. Fatzer v. MolitorSupreme Court of Kansas · 1953

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API