Amy Palmer v. Margaret Sales and Unique Insurance Company
Indiana Court of Appeals
1Concurring in part, dissenting in partBailey, Judge
The majority orders that Palmer’s change of judge motion be granted, that the process provided in the Trial Rules for a change of judge be followed, and that Palmer’s motion for a jury trial be granted and the case transferred to the plenary docket. I concur in the result of the majority’s opinion to the extent it concludes that Palmer properly moved for a jury trial, and thus orders the trial court on remand to transfer the case to the plenary docket. In light of that instruction, however, I think it is unnecessary even to address Palmer’s motion for a change of judge, and I do not think we…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Outback Steakhouse of Florida, Inc. v. MarkleyIndiana Supreme Court · 2006
- Smith v. Indiana Department of CorrectionIndiana Court of Appeals · 2007
- Snyder v. KingIndiana Supreme Court · 2011
- McClure v. CooperIndiana Court of Appeals · 2008
- Niksich v. CottonIndiana Supreme Court · 2004
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.