Legal Opinion

Zeman v. Twitter, Inc.

District Court, N.D. California

Decided September 3, 2024No. 3:23-cv-01786Unknown

1Opinion

1 2 3 4 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 5 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 7 JOHN ZEMAN, Case No. 23-cv-01786-SI 8 Plaintiff, ORDER GRANTING IN PART 9 v. PLAINTIFF'S MOTION FOR CONDITIONAL CERTIFICATION OF 10 TWITTER, INC., et al., A COLLECTIVE ACTION 11 Defendants. Re: Dkt. No. 68, 69, 79 12 13 Before the Court is plaintiff’s motion for conditional certification of a collective action. Dkt. 14 No. 68-3. Defendants oppose. Dkt. No. 78. For the forgoing reasons and for good cause shown, 15 the Court hereby GRANTS IN PART plaintiff’s motion. 16 17 BACKGROUND 18 Plaintiff is a former employee of…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Hoffmann-La Roche Inc. v. SperlingSupreme Court of the United States · 1990
  2. Daniel Campbell v. City of Los AngelesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2018
  3. Susie Bigger v. Facebook, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2020
  4. In re JPMorgan Chase & Co.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2019
  5. Leuthold v. Destination America, Inc.District Court, N.D. California · 2004

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API