Legal Opinion

Cowart v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided May 10, 1973No. R-23PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

JOHNSON, Judge.

This is an appeal from judgments pursuant to jury verdicts of guilty. We are *822confronted with, at first blush, what appears to be conflicting sections of Florida Statutes, and the interpretations thereof by the Supreme Court of Florida., In Brown v. State, 206 So.2d 377 (1968), the Supreme Court of Florida, speaking through Justice Thornal, said, inter alia:

“Necessarily included offenses should always be covered by an instruction, even though the trial judge is satisfied that the major crime charged has also been proved. If the evidence is sufficient to go to the jury on the…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Brown v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 1968
  2. DeLaine v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 1972
  3. State v. WilsonSupreme Court of Florida · 1973
  4. State v. WashingtonSupreme Court of Florida · 1972
  5. Rayner v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 1973

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Johnson v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1975
  2. Cowart v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 1973
  3. House v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1973

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API