Legal Opinion

State v. Rodriguez

New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division

Decided April 12, 2018No. DOCKET NO. A–5077–15T3; A–5078–15T3; A–5146–15T3; A–5147–15T3; A–5160–15T3PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OSTRER, J.A.D.

*217Each defendant in these five back-to-back appeals by the State was convicted of fourth-degree operating a motor vehicle during a *218period of license suspension. N.J.S.A. 2C:40-26. The statute prescribes a sentence of a "fixed minimum" term of at least 180 days without parole eligibility. N.J.S.A. 2C:40-26(c). We must decide whether the trial court exceeded its authority by ordering that defendants serve such sentences intermittently, under N.J.S.A. 2C:43-2(b)(7). The State contends the intermittent sentences are illegal. It argues a minimum period of parole ineligibility precludes…

2Cases cited25 opinions

  1. DiProspero v. PennSupreme Court of New Jersey · 2005
  2. State v. Des MaretsSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1983
  3. In re KollmanSupreme Court of New Jersey · 2012
  4. State v. RegisSupreme Court of New Jersey · 2011
  5. State v. MunafoSupreme Court of New Jersey · 2015

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. State v. Rene M. Rodriguez (081046) (Camden County and Statewide)Supreme Court of New Jersey · 2019
  2. State v. AnicamaNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 2018
  3. STATE OF NEW JERSEY VS. VICTOR FERRIGNO (15-08-0994, BERGEN COUNTY AND STATEWIDE)New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 2019

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API