S-1 ex rel. P-1 v. State Board of Education
Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
PHILLIPS, Circuit Judge:
The essential issue presented is whether following dismissal of an action under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 for prudential reasons as moot, the § 1983 plaintiffs may yet be found prevailing parties by virtue of post-dismissal events and therefore entitled to an award of attorney fees under 42 U.S.C. § 1988. In this appeal by the State of North Carolina irom such an award, we find no error and affirm.
I
When this action began, SI and S2 were handicapped children enrolled in the Ashe-boro, North Carolina city schools. In the fall of 1983, after notifying the principal at the…
2Cases cited23 opinions
- Hensley v. EckerhartSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Kentucky v. GrahamSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Farrar v. HobbySupreme Court of the United States · 1992
- Texas State Teachers Ass'n v. Garland Independent School DistrictSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
- School Committee of the Town of Burlington v. Department of EducationSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- S-1 and S-2, by and Through Their Parents and Guardians Ad Litem, P-1 and P-2 P-1 and P-2, Individually v. The State Board of Education of North Carolina Barbara Tapscott, Chairman, State Board of Education of North Carolina, and C.D. Heidgerd, Hearing Officer, Asheboro City Board of Education the Asheboro City Board of Education Mary SmithermanCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1993
- Musaid v. KirkpatrickCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2024
- Gross v. Summa FourDistrict Court, D. New Hampshire · 1995
- Purnell v. MoraDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2021
- Transport Wkrs. Union Local 100 v. NYC Transit AuthorityCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2007