Legal Opinion

McKibbin v. City of New York

New York Supreme Court

Decided June 5, 1944PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtUghetta, J.

Plaintiff, a cement mason, having brought a “ prevailing rate of wages ” action against .the City, seeks summary judgment. Defendant City cross-moves for judgment or partial judgment in its favor pursuant to rules 112, 113 and 114 of the Buies of Civil Practice.

The facts revealed by the motion papers show that on or about December 9, 1937, in a proceeding initiated by a cement mason (not this plaintiff) pursuant to the provisions of the Labor Law, the Comptroller conducted hearings and took the necessary steps to ascertain the “ prevailing rate of wages ” applicable *673to this class of municipal…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Austin v. City of New YorkNew York Court of Appeals · 1932
  2. Matter of Gaston v. TaylorNew York Court of Appeals · 1937
  3. Quayle v. City of New YorkNew York Court of Appeals · 1938
  4. Matter of Rushford v. LaguardiaNew York Court of Appeals · 1939
  5. Campbell v. City of New YorkNew York Court of Appeals · 1943

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Montebello v. New York City Housing AuthorityNew York Supreme Court · 1958
  2. Handel v. City of New YorkCivil Court of the City of New York · 1970
  3. McKibbin v. City of New YorkAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1945

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API