In re Harrison
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
2Per curiam
The respondent was served with a petition containing seven charges of professional misconduct. In his answer, he admitted the factual allegations contained in the petition, with minor exceptions, but denied that he was guilty of any professional misconduct. By stipulation dated July 11, 2000, the petition was amended. Charge Six was withdrawn, and the respondent admitted, in part, the factual allegations of Charge Five. At the hearing, the petitioner’s case consisted of 35 exhibits and the testimony of four witnesses. The respondent testified on his own behalf and…
3Cited by1 opinion
- Matter of GoldbergAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2018