Legal Opinion

Kennedy v. Joseph

Louisiana Court of Appeal

Decided January 13, 1976No. 7099PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

REDMANN, Judge.

Appellants’ pleading titled “Answer, Re-conventional and Third Party Demand” was dismissed on exceptions because it did not, within itself, allege facts constituting a cause of. action and name the third-party defendants (or defendants in reconvention). The pleading did, however, “adopt by reference all portions of the answer” of a named insurer (which alleged the missing elements of a cause of action) and it described as its intended defendants “the other persons involved in the collision detailed in plaintiff’s original petition.” We therefore reverse, holding that the…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Gallin v. Travelers Ins. Co.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 1976
  2. Bellow v. New York Fire & Marine Underwriters, Inc.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 1968
  3. Resor v. MoutonLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1967

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Kambur v. KamburLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1991
  2. Travelers Ins. Co. v. SonnierLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1977
  3. Gehr v. Department of HighwaysLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1976

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API